PII proxy scope
Mostly request or response text scanning and masking.
A PII proxy can be a useful narrow control. Talon’s 2.0 wedge is wider and more defensible: EU-sovereign egress control, pre-spend cost policy, tool governance, provider routing, and signed evidence for auditor review.
PII proxy
✓ scan text
✓ redact text
✗ prove provider routing
✗ enforce cost before spend
✗ govern tools / MCP
✗ sign auditor evidence
Talon
✓ evidence-grade AI traffic controlCore difference
Talon 2.0 should not be described as a better PII proxy. The sharper claim is that Talon turns AI traffic into signed evidence: who called, what data was detected, which policy ran, where traffic was allowed to go, what it cost, and whether the record still verifies.
Mostly request or response text scanning and masking.
Caller, tenant, policy, PII, model, cost, provider, sovereignty, tools, and evidence.
Export signed records and verify integrity with talon audit verify.
Comparison
| Capability | PII proxy | Talon |
|---|---|---|
| Request/response PII scan | Yes | Yes, with EU-focused recognizers |
| Redact sensitive text | Yes | Yes |
| Caller and tenant policy | Usually partial | Yes |
| Pre-spend cost caps | No / not primary | Yes |
| EU provider routing posture | No / not primary | Yes |
| Model allowlist by data tier | No / not primary | Yes |
| Tool and MCP governance | No | Yes |
| Signed evidence record | No | HMAC-signed |
| Auditor export | Depends on implementation | CSV / JSON / signed export |
When to use each
Use a PII proxy if the buyer only needs to mask sensitive strings. Use Talon when the buyer must prove governed AI traffic for a customer, DPO, security, board, or auditor review.
Use Talon when the buyer asks:
- What data left?
- Where did it go?
- Which policy allowed it?
- Was spend capped before the call?
- Which tools were exposed?
- Can you verify the record?Practical test
Send a request with test PII, inspect the decision, export the evidence, and verify the signature.